They are: eftirfarandi:. Example 2. We can easily use the same method to solve a fourth degree equation or equations of a still higher degree. First we find the integer factors of the constant term, 2. Sometimes we can solve a third degree equation by bracketing the terms two by two and finding a factor that they have in common. Lets look at an example of this. Example 3. They are:. The examples we have looked at so far are all equations where the term with the highest power has the coefficient 1.
We can look for integer solutions in the same way as before by testing the factors of the constant term d. This is studied in Galois theory. The general quintic is not solvable in terms of radicals, as well as equations of higher degrees. There most certainly is, but its ugly, complicated, and not worth memorizing.
People know about it and have quoted or cited it for you, but really they would never use it. If you want something actually useful for pen-and-paper solutions, you might want to understand the actual theory behind the solution.
I will provide one method below. The Quartic Formula is just the end result of this methodology, written in terms of the original coefficients. Because of that, the method is far easier to remember than the formula, which is why I find it annoying when people cite just the formula and tell you, "dont bother, use a computer instead. Understanding how its done - even if you never use it - expands your brain and your understanding, allows you to implement it in programming, and allows you to recreate it whenever you may need it instead of hyper reliance on computers to always be there for you, which, in my opinion, makes for a poor mathematician.
Ferrari's Method is historically the first method discovered. Euler's Method looks a lot like Cardano's Method for the Cubic and was probably modeled after the same approach. But I am partial to Descartes' Quadratic Factorization technique. Its a relatively simple process to follow and is what I will be using below. If you want to see how the others work, let me know. They all end up roughly the same place too: solving a cubic equation. So you need to be prepared for that. I recommend you brush up on that; I wont explain solving the cubic here but will only refer to it.
We must convert this quartic into a depressed monic quartic. All points have shifted, therefore the roots have shifted, but by the same constant. This has no effect on the root positions; all the lead coefficient did was scale up the non-zero values. There is absolutely no loss in generality with respect to the zeros.
There is still no cubic term and now there is no lead coefficient either. What might be interesting to note is what has happened to the polynomial. We started out with 5 arbitrary constants and have reduced it to 3, by normalizing the lead and removing the cubic term. Although the latter three are computed from the original five, they have arbitrary values, and there is no loss in generality.
This is a significant simplification of the problem. The non-existence of the cubic term will prove vital. Everything so far has simply been the setup: writing the polynomial in reduced monic form. Recall all of the quartic methods accomplish at least this much.
Next we implement Descartes Factorization method. This is a required condition to make the methodology work. The reason is because now all solutions with non-zero imaginary components come in complex conjugate pairs. Big deal? It allows us to group two solutions together, even if they are purely real, into quadratic factors with real coefficients. Clearly the task at hand is to find the values of these constants. If we can convert 1 into 2 by determining quadratic factors that satisfies the equation, we can find the roots with the quadratic formula applied to those quadratic factors.
From here we form two new equations by adding and subtracting the previous two. One unknown, one remaining equation. It's a sextic, not a quartic, which is worse. And thus we are essentially done. Techniques which I only assume you already know about if you are trying to solve quartics. Just like with quartics, as you know already, there do exist cubic formulae, but I do recommend learning the methods behind them. If you need help with cubics, I recommend Cardano's method the original solution or Vieta's Trigonometric Solution my preferred.
There is also Completing the Cube, a nice proof of concept but Id never use it. Feel free to ask a separate question for a cubic and I will be happy to answer. The point is that the problem has been reduced from that of finding the roots of a quartic to that of finding the roots of a cubic. A simpler problem! That's usually how it goes. All quartic root finding methods require finding the roots of a cubic first, obvious or not.
Just as finding the roots of a cubic involve solving a quadratic. Hope this works for you. Still not done. This solves the depressed monic quartic we started Descartes Quadratic Factorization method with. Dont forget about the original quartic we had at the very beginning, prior to the depression and normalization.
You are going to arrive at a set of solutions when done. Be sure to check your answers. Hint: Notice that in the general equation, the coefficient of x 2 is not equal to 1.
Divide both sides of the equation by a , so that the coefficient of x 2 is 1. Since the coefficient on x is , the value to add to both sides is. Write the left side as a binomial squared. Evaluate as. Write the fractions on the right side using a common denominator. Add the fractions on the right.
Use the Square Root Property. Remember that you want both the positive and negative square roots! Subtract from both sides to isolate x. The denominator under the radical is a perfect square, so:. Add the fractions since they have a common denominator. There you have it, the Quadratic Formula. Solving a Quadratic Equation using the Quadratic Formula. The Quadratic Formula will work with any quadratic equation, but only if the equation is in standard form,.
To use it, follow these steps. Be careful to include negative signs if the bx or c terms are subtracted. That's a lot of steps. Use the Quadratic Formula to solve the equation. First write the equation in standard form. Note that the subtraction sign means the constant c is negative. Substitute the values into the Quadratic Formula. Simplify, being careful to get the signs correct.
Simplify the radical:. Separate and simplify to find the solutions to the quadratic equation. Note that in one, 6 is added and in the other, 6 is subtracted. The power of the Quadratic Formula is that it can be used to solve any quadratic equation, even those where finding number combinations will not work. Most of the quadratic equations you've looked at have two solutions, like the one above. The following example is a little different. Subtract 6 x from each side and add 16 to both sides to put the equation in standard form.
Identify the coefficients a , b , and c. Since 8 x is subtracted, b is negative. Since the square root of 0 is 0, and both adding and subtracting 0 give the same result, there is only one possible value. Again, check using the original equation. Let's try one final example. This one also has a difference in the solution. Simplify the radical, but notice that the number under the radical symbol is negative!
Check these solutions in the original equation. Be careful when expanding the squares and replacing i 2 with You may have incorrectly factored the left side as x — 2 2. The correct answer is or. Using the formula,. If you forget that the denominator is under both terms in the numerator, you might get or. However, the correct simplification is , so the answer is or. The Discriminant. These examples have shown that a quadratic equation may have two real solutions, one real solution, or two complex solutions.
In the Quadratic Formula, the expression underneath the radical symbol determines the number and type of solutions the formula will reveal. You can always find the square root of a positive, so evaluating the Quadratic Formula will result in two real solutions one by adding the positive square root, and one by subtracting it. There will be one real solution.
0コメント